A Sermon by Donel McClellan
First Congregational United Church of Christ">

 

 

 

A Sermon by Donel McClellan
First Congregational United Church of Christ, Bellingham, Washington

Hot Topics:
4. Would Jesus Drive an SUV?

July 8, 2001

Scripture Lesson: Psalm 104

Let me get a couple of things out of the way right off the bat.

First I would like to see a show of hands of everyone who drove to church in a Sports Utility Vehicle this morning. Now, would those who have an SUV at home but didn’t use it this morning put up their hands?

Alright, I have a message for all of you who own SUVs. We are not talking about you specifically, but about a culture in which you and all the rest of us are participants. It is a culture that celebrates newness, speed, comfort and modernity. It is a culture that is all too eager to value you on the basis of where you live, what you wear and what you drive. SUVs happen to be the symbol-of-the-moment for this consumer culture. They are not the problem in themselves. They are one reflection of the problem.

Second, I need to exhaust the humor around this sermon title so we can get on to more significant things.

Most people assume WWJD stands for ‘What would Jesus do?” But the initials really stand for “What would Jesus drive?” One theory is that Jesus would tool around in an old Plymouth because “the Bible says God drove Adam and Eve out of the Garden of Eden in a Fury.” But in a passage from Psalm 83 it appears that the Almighty owns a Pontiac and a Geo. The psalmist urges the Lord to “pursue your enemies with your Tempest and terrify them with your Storm.

On the other hand . . .

Perhaps God favors Dodge pickup trucks, because Moses’ followers are warned not to go up a mountain “until they make a long blast with the Ram’s horn.” Some scholars insist that Jesus drove a Honda but didn’t like to talk about it.  As proof, they cite a verse in St.  John’s gospel where Christ tells a crowd, “For I did not speak of my own Accord...” Meanwhile, Moses rode an old British motorcycle, as evidenced by a Bible passage declaring that “the roar of Moses’ Triumph is heard in the hills.” Joshua drove a Triumph sports car with a hole in its muffler: “Joshua’s Triumph was heard throughout the land.” And, following the Master’s lead, the Apostles car pooled in a Honda for, “The Apostles were in one Accord.” [1]

The whole idea of asking the rather ridiculous question “Would Jesus Drive an SUV” comes from a demonstration reported in a Christian Science Monitor article last month.[2] A small group of demonstrators, led by Bill McKibben of the Harvard Divinity School, carried signs past automobile dealerships in an attempt to make an ecological point. McKibben explained,

We are asking our neighbors not to buy sport-utility vehicles when they purchase their next cars. We want to let the dealers know that customers need cleaner choices.

The title for the article, “What would Jesus Drive?” came from a sign created by UCC minister Dan Smith, who noted that his church parking lot is full of SUVs on Sunday mornings. He said,

I happen to love the people who drive them, [but] I feel we could all be better informed about the consequences of our decisions as consumers and as Christians.

So, what is the big deal, and why is this particular sermon a Hot Topic? I would suggest that it is because American Christians are ill informed and relatively uninterested in the effect of our personal and national choices upon the environment.

There is a general consensus among those who monitor our world environment that a threat is growing exponentially. Kirkpatrick Sale found an analogy that puts the dilemma in perspective.

It’s as if humankind were living in a huge unbreakable bottle, into which is placed a small drop of exponential water that doubles in size once a day. One day we discover that the water has filled up half the bottle, and we say, well, it’s taken an awful long time for it to get up to here; we probably have no reason to worry just yet. Surely with technology we’ll be able to adjust to it as we have so far. The next day we drown.

The crises of the present, in other words, have now grown so large, so interlocked, so exponential, that they pose a threat unlike that ever known.[3]

What is the threat? It is multiple, but the current concern which encompasses many environmental threats is the issue of global warming. The fact that the earth is getting warmer is indisputable. The reasons for the warming remain somewhat controversial. What action we will take is currently under debate in congress and around the world.

Since the late 19th century our earth’s temperature has increased from ½-1E Fahrenheit. The 10 warmest years of the last century occurred after 1985. 1998 was the warmest year on record. The ice cap in the Arctic decreased and the global sea level rose between 4 and 8 inches in the past century.[4] Projecting into the future, it is estimated that in the next 100 years there will be a rise in temperature of 2.5-10.4E with a resulting rise in sea level of between 3.4-34.4 inches.[5]

The cause of this warming is an increase in greenhouse gases. These atmospheric components are called greenhouse gases because they trap heat. They are essential to our survival on earth. Without them the temperature on the earth’s surface would be 0E Fahrenheit rather than the present 57E. They are a kind of blanket that keeps the heat of the earth from dissipating into space.

Many greenhouse gasses are naturally produced. Carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and ozone have always been present. Human activity has increased these and added more. The burning of fossil fuels and wood products adds to the carbon dioxide. Methane is produced by the production and transportation of coal, natural gas and oil and by raising livestock. Industrial and agricultural activities increase nitrous oxide. And powerful gases which are not naturally occurring are the result of industrial processes. These include hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). These gases differ in their ability to trap heat and the latter are among the most efficient.

When the greenhouse gasses increase, more heat is retained and our weather becomes warmer. This has many effects on the earth and its population. A warmer climate increases the frequency of drought around the world. It causes higher winds and more severe storms. It may result in less snowfall and resultant water and energy shortages. And warmer weather increases the area in which insect borne disease can spread. The impact is great on the industrialized nations and can be cataclysmic to the nations of the Global South.

As that great intergalactic ambassador, Dr. Spock, once observed:

This troubled planet is a place of the most violent contrasts. Those that receive the rewards are totally separated from those who shoulder the burdens. It is not a wise leadership.[6]

Not everyone agrees on the degree of danger posed by global warming. As far as I can determine, one’s position depends, in part, upon one’s relationship to industries that find the production of fuels and raw materials to be immensely profitable.

Here is point at which we may forge a link to the world of Jesus. We won’t get very far with the image of the SUV itself. Jesus said very little about transportation. Traditionally we understand that he rode in utero to Bethlehem on a donkey with his mother Mary. Later in his ministry he once borrowed a donkey for a small parade into Jerusalem on Palm Sunday. Other than that Jesus, like the vast majority of people in his day, traveled by walking.

Transportation and the deteriorating environment weren’t issues in Jesus’ day. But he does talk a great deal about the driving force beneath our interest in larger cars and higher return on investment. Jesus is very concerned about the power of money and possessions.

Like the prophets who came before him, Jesus was suspicious of the powerful and the wealthy. In a series of directives to his followers, Jesus is an unrelenting advocate of the poor and their needs. What about beggars? Give to everyone who begs from you; and if anyone takes away your goods, do not ask for them again.[7] What about saving for a rainy day? Sell your possessions, and give alms. Make purses for yourselves that do not wear out, an unfailing treasure in heaven, where no thief comes near and no moth destroys. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.[8]

Little in the way of material reward was promised to those who followed Jesus.  And Jesus said to him, "Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." [9] And those who were sent out in Jesus name were to, Take nothing for your journey, no staff, nor bag, nor bread, nor money—not even an extra tunic. Whatever house you enter, stay there, and leave from there. [10]

The dangers of possessions were clear in Jesus’ advice to a wealthy young man who was advised to give all he possessed to the poor and follow Jesus. And to the rest of his followers Jesus warned, No slave can serve two masters; for a slave will either hate the one and love the other, or be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and wealth.[11]

On the other hand, Jesus was infinitely trusting in the God of creation.

Look at the birds above your head
       
they neither plant nor reap
        they neither store nor hoard
    yet day by day God gives them food

 Look at the flowers beneath your feet
        they neither card not spin
        they neither sow nor weave
    yet King Solomon shone less brightly than they

      So why worry about your life
             what you are to eat
             what you will have to wear.
[12]

So, would Jesus drive an SUV?

I doubt it.

He was among the poorest of the poor in Israel and I don’t see how he could afford any car were he to walk into our midst this morning. But I suspect that he would push us to examine the ways in which our wealth and our spending burden others. He might ask what we would be willing to give up in order to join a movement to turn our nation away from environmental disaster. He might suggest that we consider whether we love what we possess more than we love our neighbors, more than we love ourselves, more than we love our God. Jesus might invite us to take a stand against the moneyed forces which would sacrifice land, natural beauty, and environmental wisdom for a larger profit.

Wherever we find ourselves at this moment, we can adjust our course to be more harmonious with God’s dream of a peaceful and just community on earth. The problem is to know where to begin. Joel E. Cohen ends his book How Many People Can the Earth Support?[13] with three choices we have for the future. He calls our alternatives “Bigger Pie; Fewer Forks; Better Manners”:

Bigger Pie: As the world becomes one market and the wealth of the developed nations is slowly exchanged for goods and services from the less developed nations, there will be a growth in the world economy. Technology may provide a better life for others if it is used appropriately. If we can learn to distribute wealth appropriately, the economic pie can provide a better life for all of earth’s citizens.

Fewer Forks: Efforts to limit birth rates and provide for more efficient diets can reduce the demand on the resources of the planet. Americans could lead the way by simplifying their lifestyle, moving their dietary consumption down the food chain—less meat, more vegetables—, and sharing their wealth with those most in need. That is an objective within the reach of all of us.

Better Manners: Our manners as individuals, as nations, and as multinational corporations need to be improved. Compassion and consideration for others might be a beginning. International agreements about the environment and global warming need to be pursued and the means of governing corporations which have more power than many nations must be addressed.

If you own an SUV I hope you enjoy it. And, when it is time to trade it in on something else, perhaps you will consider my modest suggestion and ask Jesus what kind of car he would like your family to have.

Amen.



[1].       Email from the internet forwarded by Jennifer Russell. Some of the translations are somewhat adjusted for humor. The sources of the email are an article in the San Francisco Chronicle by Scott Ostler $50 Million for Not Being Awful, Wednesday, March 15, 2000, and Roy Rivenberg’s weekly column, Off Kilter, September 6, 2000 http://www.offkilter.org/jesusdmv.html

[2].         “Anti-SUV query: ‘What would Jesus drive?’”, The Christian Science Monitor, Monday, June 4, 2001 p. 3

[3].         Kirkpatrick Sale, Human Scale (New York: Coward, McCann & Geoghegan, 1980), 26.

[4].         US Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa.gov/globalwarming/climate/index.html

[5].         Almanac of Policy Issues, http://www.policyalmanac.org/environment/global_warming.shtml      

[6].         Dr. Spock, The Cloud Minders, episode 74 of Star Trek.

[7].         Luke 6:30

[8].         Luke 12.33

[9].         Luke 9.58

[10].       Luke 9.3-4

[11].       Luke 16.13

[12].       Matthew 6:25-33 translated by John Dominic Crossan, The Essential Jesus: Original Sayings and Earliest Images, 1994, Harper San Francisco, p. 81

[13].       New York: Norton, 1996